Jump to content

Talk:Departing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 9 November 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The article remains at the primary title in the absence of consensus on what other encyclopedic topics, if any, there are with the same name. (non-admin closure)Uanfala (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


DepartingDeparting (album) – Restore original "(album)". Probably should simply be deleted. But if it stays not the primary topic of departing. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What bearing does this have on WP:TITLE and WP:NOPRIMARY? An obscure album cannot be not the primary topic of "departing". In ictu oculi (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOPRIMARY applies If there are multiple topics (even just two). So what's the second? 162 etc. (talk) 15:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment while we're at it, shouldn't Depart go elsewhere? Ideally we can make a DAB with depart/departing, add a link to the wiktionary and clean up a bit, I don't think these obscure albums should be at the base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ortizesp There is already Depart (disambiguation). a round robin of sorts can be performed between Tanya Chua's album and the dab page. Fyi, Tanya Chua's album isn't exactly obscure in certain parts of the world. Winning a major award at an esteemed music award (though politically tainted) is not a small feat. – robertsky (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I reckon Depart (disambiguation) should be moved to Depart, with Departing as a redirect. Then list all of these entries on the page with wiktionary links. Would that work? Ortizesp (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely not. It's fine as it is. WP:SMALLDETAILS and WP:NATURALDIS apply.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.