Talk:Diana

Diana Monkey

Who is Diana the monkey? Joyous! | Talk 22:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I removed it. Joyous! | Talk 23:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I've put the Diana Monkey back in again because it's a real animal! The thought of Diana the monkey is very endearing, though. HilJackson 13:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Royalty

I think being a princess, Diana deserves her own subheading. I mean "mythology" has its own subheading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.248.109.163 (talk • contribs)

Adding information to a disambiguation page

Hello. I would like to add Diana airguns under other, but it will not show up when I click save (but it does show up in show preview). Could someone perhaps add this to the list? (The text that I was trying to insert should be there, in the edit page, it will just not show up in the final product for some reason. Thanks for the help.--Andrew19903 13:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thanks to whoever added this to the list! --Andrew19903 15:32, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diana is a lovely name — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:2542:C968:D1B6:CE7D:8720:910F (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

122.2.12.155 (talk) 06:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No identifiable request. Iffy★Chat -- 09:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Diana (mythology) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: clear consensus not to move the page as proposed at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diana → Diana (disambiguation) – Diana should redirect to Diana, Princess of Wales per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. The princess gets the most views and has much more long-term significance than anyone else named Diana. The goddess does not get very many views compared to the princess. Even a Google Search and Google Book Search come up with results for the princess and virtually none for the goddess. Diana, Princess of Wales is PRIMARYREDIRECT for the term Diana. CookieMonster755 ✉ 20:16, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose — Certainly the princess has more views, but how many of those come from a reader searching simply for Diana rather than Diana Spencer, Diana of Wales, Lady Diana, etc.? We don't know. My guess is that the number is too low to make the princess the primary topic for the term Diana, but high enough to prevent any other topic such as Diana (mythology) from claiming primacy either. In such situations, readers are best served by the current situation. Certes (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move. Though it's possible that the princess has the most current significance even two decades after her death, I doubt she has enough long-term significance to be the primary topic. ONR (talk) 22:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per above. No page views evidence has even been presented so Hitchen's Razor applies. And page views alone don't demonstrate long-term significance, only current popularity. Citing "Google Search" should be automatic opposition due to the inherent bias involved. -- Netoholic @ 02:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Certes, ONR and Netoholic. Anyone seeking data regarding the princess via is more likely to type the shorthand WP:COMMONNAME redirect, Princess Di, rather than simply "Diana". Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and speedy close per WP:SNOW and WP:TROUT In ictu oculi (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If anything, the goddess should be primary. The Princess certainly isn't._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:30, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As we've already established with the goddess, there's no clear primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for reasons stated above. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Oppose - Sorry but I don't think Diana's a PRIMARYREDIRECT here, As per all of the above oppose. –Davey2010^Talk 15:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.