Jump to content

Talk:Dinitrogen pentoxide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Article was promoted from stub status due to its length; expand tag added to allow other editors to decide if there room for expansion SP-KP 14:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Structure of gas-phase N2O5[edit]

The picture of the molecular structure correctly indicates the known bond angles in the gas phase compound. The source for this information should be cited: Hedberg, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3789-3793. However, the shape of the molecule is incorrect, as is the "Structure" box farther down. Recent theoretical calculations (Theor. Exp. Chem. 2007, 43, 66-70 and references therein) suggest that a non-planar Cs structure, with the NO2 groups rotated 90º relative to the central NON plane, is the lowest energy gas phase structure. The indication in the Structure box that the symmetry is nearly D2h because of an near 180 NON angle is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.231.66.25 (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


NO2BF4[edit]

"Nitronium hexafluoroantimonate (1) Nitronium tetrafluoroborate (3) Linear Formula: NO2BF4, Formula Weight: 132.81, CAS Number: 13826-86-3 73508 purum, packed in PTFE bottles, ≥95.0% (T) (Fluka) 366153 ≥95% (Aldrich) 175021 85% (Aldrich) Nitronium tetrafluoroborate solution (2)" --Smokefoot 18:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dinitrogen pentoxide/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Most sections are covered, but need fleshing out significantly. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

ClNO2 or NO2Cl?[edit]

The inconsistent use between the two may mislead readers into thinking they are different compounds, or are bounded differently. Personally, I find ClNO2 to be the more accurate of the two, but as a student, I'd like an in-the-field professional to verify my claim. I realize they are both "accurate" in that the compound is composed of the same proportions of elements, but anyone who's learned organic chemistry knows one cannot simply deduce their chemical structures off reading the numbers of carbons and hydrogens and whatever within the element alone. Oddnaud (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]