Talk:Doc Frankenstein
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not promotional
[edit]@Epikman: I disagree with the "news release" evaluation. As far as I can tell, the lede is a history of the publication, plus a couple of relevant statements from the creators; the plot summary is NPOV and free from puffery; and the Awards section is perfectly normal.
The only problem I see is that, as noted, it needs a couple more citations in the lede, and certainly should have them for the plot summary. If you consider the plot summary itself improper, please address that directly.
Please {{Ping}} me to discuss. --Thnidu (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)