Talk:Drunken Master II

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,039)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,446) • Stub-Class articles (6,731)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (389) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Sources

Can we really not find a better source discussing the differences between the US version and the original? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.56.71 (talk) 07:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this film making it to Time's All-Time 100 Movies list(http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/the_complete_list.html) is worth mentioning.(Bairuz (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Go ahead and add it in the Critical Reception section, if you feel it's relevant. I would note that it was compiled in 2005. Gram123 (talk) 15:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot?

Who wrote the plot contained in this article? It barely touches on the plot of the film and completely omits the character names/actors contained within.

Also there is very little, if anything, regarding the fallout between Lau Kar Leung and Jackie Chan, which at the time added a lot of media interest in the film and probably didn't hurt the box office takings in Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.206.254 (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional style?

"It was Jackie Chan's first traditional style martial arts film since The Young Master (1980)" - was Dragon Lord (1982) not in the traditional style then? If not, why not? --Cal42 (talk) 08:42, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Lord places its emphasis on stunts and sports and not traditional martial arts scenes. In the end Jackie basically defeats his ememy by being able to take more punishment while falling than any kind of martial arts skill. Crazymaner2003 (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Drunken Master II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.ew.com/ew/article/review/movie/0,6115,278367_1_0_,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]