Talk:Earl of Mansfield

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hertfordshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

[Untitled]

I'm assuming the Scottish titles have a standard remainder but I can't clarify atm. I have split the two lordships which should really have their own article but who was the first holder of the 1641 title. Alci12 22:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

second heir apparent

Why isn't the Master of Stormont listed as "Lord Scone"? —Tamfang (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The heir-apparent to a viscountcy (as such) never gets a courtesy peerage, nor does the second heir-apparent to an earldom. —Tamfang (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earl of Mansfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202054024/http://www.mixedblessingstheatregroup.co.uk/ to http://www.mixedblessingstheatregroup.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Master of Stormont

I would not list "Master of Stormont" as a subsidiary title, because the Earl does not hold it. The title Master of X belongs to the heir (apparent or presumptive) to the title Lord X (edit 2023: or Lord Blank of X). Calling it a subsidiary title of the earldom is like saying Duke of Rothesay is a subsidiary title of the monarch. —Tamfang (talk) 01:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamfang: that is a very good point. On a related topic, perhaps the titles Lord Scone and Lord Balvaird should be added as subsidiary titles, if you feel that would be suitable. Those two titles were held by successive Viscounts Stormont from the fourth Viscount Stormont onward; later, David Murray, 7th Viscount Stormont (1727–1796) succeeded as Earl of Mansfield in 1793. — Blairall (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, done. I did not link Lord Scone because that redirects to Stormont. —Tamfang (talk) 03:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sequence of sequences

The present earl is listed as "9th and 8th". Is that how he is described in authoritative sources? As he is 8th of the senior creation and 9th of the junior, one might expect "8th and 9th". —Tamfang (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]