Talk:Earnest Woodall
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I am a close friend of Earnest Woodall and he has given me the permission to use all images that have been used and everything that has been used has been run through him. I am sure that this is not a copyright infringement.
If you have any problems check ewoodall.com or email him for further questioning at ewoodall@optonline.net
If the review are the issue please specify that and I will remove them. Thank you.
- Ah, I see. You should still reword though, because this still copies text from other websites, and since this was contested, you should have time to do that. C. Foultz 17:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, was the issue the Catch 22 stuff? I jsut used the sidebar as a template I think all that text is gone now. Ill work on rephrasing the reviews I suppose or would putting them in quote markers be good to ?
- I was looking over it and thought it seemed suspicious for an encyclopedia article to look like this, because then I did a search and found the same wording and sentences, so I put a CSD up. (You can then use those websites that the information came from as references.) And by the way, a second thing to look over while you're fixing it up is keeping a neutral point of view like a Wikipedia article should. C. Foultz 13:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will fix it all up as well as I can. I think the article is fairly neutral but their is some stuff I can straighten out.
- I was looking over it and thought it seemed suspicious for an encyclopedia article to look like this, because then I did a search and found the same wording and sentences, so I put a CSD up. (You can then use those websites that the information came from as references.) And by the way, a second thing to look over while you're fixing it up is keeping a neutral point of view like a Wikipedia article should. C. Foultz 13:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)