Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/Archive 1

His name is not spelled Edward in EVERY episode. It is mostly but I’ve seen one where it is Eddward which makes more sense since his name is Double D (Edd).

Wrong Spelling

Guys, the proper spelling to Edd's full name is Ed-ward. That's how his PARENTS call him. It appears like that in EVERY episode with a sticky note. If they get wrong, they are very terrible parents.

They are indeed "a bit" strange (to say the least), since they communicate with their son strictly throughout sticky notes.

Actually, later on in the series it is written just as "Eddward", I believe. It may be both, but Eddward makes more sense. --InfallibleRoxi 15:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Edward's middle name is spelled incorrectly. I don't think it was "MaryAnn", but rather, Marion. This name seems less feminine and sounded more like "Marion" when Edward relays it. --Perry Mason

Sarah

Sarah, Ed's controlling sister, has a big crush on double-D

I think the crush had been only suggested for 1 episode, but to the later of the series the fact might be that both Sarah and Nazz have a better impression on Edd (than at least Eddy).

2 episodes.--Centurion Ry 14:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peach Creek

Ed, Edd n Eddy does take place in Peach Creek. I don't know if that's also the name of an actual place or not, but even if it is, I doubt it was intentional.

"The cursed phone episode was made before the Lemony Snicket movie came out." How is this trivia?

"Double D's middle name is Marion, not Miriam." It probably is Marion, but since that was put under Double D's info, it doesn't belong in the trivia section. Also, that sentence seems more like something to be said on the talk page.—Boarder8925 14:25, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Using the article as a blog

Comments such as "We need a DVD with all episodes and holiday specials!" are not encyclopedic. They belong on blogs and message boards, not Wikipedia. Bobber2, frickin' read this stuff!

—Quickbreak 22:38, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Change to a Category?

Should this article be deleted and instead become only a category, listing all of the episodes and the general description like it does now? Ed Otto 0000, 30 Apr 2005 (IST)

Jonny

It's spelled "Jonny," not "Johnny." Watch the show for yourself, and in the credits you'll see "Jonny 2x4." Or you can view this page and search for "Jonny."—Sixteen Left 20:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Petition(s)

Do not LiNK to petitions to save Ed, Edd n Eddy, for two reasons: 1) Ed, Edd n Eddy has been renewed, and 2) Wikipedia is not the place to LiNK to petitions.—Sixteen Left 20:38, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

what's the purpose of the "Gadgets" section? --Philo 02:25, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT THE HECK'S WITH THE CHARACTER SECTION?! THE ONLY REAL BULLY I'VE SEEN IS KEVIN AND THE REST ARE ALL JUST EITHER ANNOYING OR BRATTY, BUT ARE USUALLY SOMEWHAT NICE! SOMEBODY NEEDS TO REVERT ALL OF THIS, AND IT SURE AS HECK WON'T BE ME! THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR MESSING WITH MY FAVORITE SHOW WILL PAY!

PS: The "McRich" thig was probably something Eddy made up because he wants to be rich.

McRich is not Eddy's last name. He only used it in one episode where the kids were role playing, pretending to be rich snobs.--Elaich 16:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edd

Where was it revealed that Edd's birthday was on November 14 1990? That would make him 14, well 15 in a couple of days. User:Lord Sephiroth, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

protect?

this article should be protected to deal with vandalism. someone keeps adding bull like "character is a bully to the eds" or "this show should be on adult swim for name-calling". do you think we should ask for protection? --Phil 16:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's not worth it, we could always just revert vandilsm. Besides, there are some people who are trying to help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wack'd About Wiki (talk • contribs) 01:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

yea, it's definately better to revert than to protect for this level of vandalism. «»Who ?¿?^meta 01:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why protect an article that has been flagged for cleaning up? The vandalism stinks. This is like having to paint out graffiti every morning just to find it back again the next day. All over a kid's cartoon series, to boot.

Some people are just idiots. --D-hyo 15:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy and "homosexuality"

The comment about Jimmy being "homosexual" was removed because it is an opinion, and without evidence in the show. Assuming that one stereotyped Jimmy's preference with Sarah or fragility. This does not imply homosexuality.

Good job. How can a 7 or 8 year old boy be homosexual? Too much fanmongering in this subject, and too many kids who can't spell and can't write always adding strange adolescent takes on things that are quite normal. Since the article is now well written, maybe protection is the way to go.--Elaich 07:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It should be indicated as effeminate. A example would be Ignatius from Krypto the Superdog.

yea, but the makers do play with his "childishness". i remember in one of the episodes he says "show me something mister!" after throwing beads to double d. also in another episode when double d was sleeping basically through the whole thing, jimmy and sarah take him in as a patient. later in the episode when the pair sees him again, jimmy exclaims"i want to take his temperature!" he was also an interior decorator in one of the episodes Kooshkaboose

I agree. being described as "effeminate" doesn't necessarily make you gay. just ask king cold or jafar. --Philo 06:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well. It has never been said by any of the staff of the series that Jimmy is officially homosexual. Actually, it has been more hinted that he has a crush on Sarah than that he is homosexual. Black Kat 16:26, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eddy's brother

There is no evidence of any kind that Eddy's brother ever paid anybody to keep Eddy from having fun through his whole childhood. Removed. Will the person posting this junk please stop, or post proof, like the episode in which it is mentioned?--Elaich 16:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it

For those that keep adding speculations re Rolf - Danny Antonucci's own words:

"Rolf is me and all of my cousins. My parents were right off the boat so I grew up playing to two worlds, the modern world and the 1950s Italian world. My parents like Rolf's lived - still live in the past, with strong traditions and strange cooking and having a hard time assimilating to modern life. 'Yeah, I purposely made Rolf with a non-nationality, especially after what happened with Lupo when we were accused of painting Italians in a bad light. But Rolf is me, take his proverbs - my family were always coming out with the strange proverbial stuff that only made sense to them and other family members. His vocabulary is always interesting, I've actually browsed through the dictionary sometimes looking for words he might use, we came in for some flak with 'jujubes' though, people were asking what on earth that meant, but its there, you know what they are right? (I nod) Leaving Rolf with no set nationality means he's able to adopt all sorts of quirks he couldn't get away with if we'd stuck a label on him."

Rolf has no set nationality. He is of some Mid European descent, which seems more Slavic than Germanic. Please stop adding speculations to the article. He is not North European (Viking or Russian), nor South (Italian/Greco) nor East (Arabic) nor West (Britainia, French or Spanish.) Mid Europe is a mish mash of cultures and and Rolf is certainly a mish mash.--Elaich 09:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

will this article ever be saved?

People are taking a silly children's cartoon WAY TOO SERIOUSLY. sentences like "sarah is almost as strong as her brother"? what's next? "characters have the ability to run off cliffs and stand in the air until they realize and look down, then they fall". give me a break. also, the character's articles are fancruft and should be merged into this main article --Phil 04:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and put a {{merge}} label on the necessary articles, or link them here, and I'll do it. Kerowyn 06:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did most of them.

okay

okay, as of this writing the article looks pretty good. I removed most fancruft and specific details. if any other 9 yr old kid comes again and writes this article in POV just revert it. or something. --Phil 14:58, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks fine now, except that someone resorted to fancruft in the Jimmy bio. It was stated that Jimmy is 8. Danny Antonucci himself said that the children have no stated ages, except Eddy, who is 12. I changed it to read that Jimmy is PROBABLY eight. That has always seemed about right to me, except that he is a very childish 8.

Also, the term "effeminate" applied to a child has always ruffled me. I changed it to read "childish", which is far closer to the truth. The effeminate badge was likely applied last summer by the editor who was determined to make Jimmy gay.

I also deleted re Nazz:

"It was revealed in a recent episode that she used to be morbidly obese."

That was from a fantasy retro clip show, in which many supposed "truths" were revealed to be untrue. This is fancruft and does not belong.

Elaich 04:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the kiddies attacked again. Ed is now "a moron" "who can copy anybody's handwriting." DELETED - no proof. Also added more fancruft which I deleted. -- Elaich 08:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More fancruft deleted. *sigh* Does this ever end? Where is it ever said that Ed and Sarah's mom is named Eudora? Eudora is an email program that was named after a certain postmaster. Or that Ed's father is a used car salesman? That's Eddy's father (a supposition arrived at by speculation over one sentence that Eddy utters.) Ed is neither autistic or retarded - PLEASE, whoever adds this junk, STOP. Autistic people rarely can even talk. Retarded people are not in the same classes in school with unretarded people. PLEASE stop this nonsense. Use some sense, or post episode numbers and titles to back up your claims. I will delete this kind of nonsense and speculation until Doomsday. -- Elaich 08:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"In the episode O Ed eleven, the Eds pose as construction workers to prevent them from being noticed by the Kanker sisters. When the girls ask for edd`s ID, he shows them an index card that says "Walter Sobchack: Construction worker." Just under the name is a crossed out name that says "Edd Sobchack". This proves Edd`s full name is Edward Marion Sobchack."

PLEASE do some Googling before you arrive at such half baked conclusions. Walter Sobchack was the main character in a popular 1990s movie. This only proves that the makers of the cartoon are quite clever with pop culture references. -- Elaich 08:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People: a unseen character is someone who is repeatedly referred to but never seen - NOT someone who's arm was seen in one episode. We know that the Eds have parents, but aside from Sarah & Ed's mom, who is referred to repeatedly, they are almost never mentioned. Therefore, they are NOT unseen characters. -- Elaich 03:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rolf's Great Nano

Why Does somebody keep deleting Great Nano's name? he's name is Urn Rolf said it himself in Knock Knock Who's Ed?

Somebody deleted Rolf's grandfothers name again who keeps doing this? for the final time rolf's grandfother is named Urn Urn Urn and for the last time Urn so please stop deleting this i'm telling you Rolf said his name was Urn in Knock Knock Who's Ed?

They were in Rolf's den. He was talking about the urn that his great nano is in. It's a stretch to assume otherwise. Evil saltine 14:18, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

agreed with evil --Phil 15:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

URN= JAR OF ASHES. the great Nano is dead and IN the urn.

Ok,in the urn?How can ashes be hairy or eat dip(In like Ed)

He was hairy and/or ate dip. It's sooo obvious, gees.T-borg 17:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Rolf's Great Nano (great-grandfather) was cremated and sits in a snowglobe on Rolf's mantlepiece, which he incorrectly calls an urn. According to a couple episodes, his Nana (grandmother) is a big hairy beast with a wooden leg. --Zenosaga 22:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection

I have asked for semi-protection of this article

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection ] --Phil 03:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

..and obviously, it didn't help. the admin took it away and now we got this article clogging up with crap again. --Phil 05:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edd

I dont think Edd is a hygenic freak, he wears a hat every day for 24 hours, I wouldnt call that good gromming Whopper 14:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

to the editors adding quotes to the article: if you want to list one-shot, one-liners, do it at wikiquote. wikiquote:Ed, Edd n Eddy --Phil 01:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But he has several of the same hat (one for each day, actually, as seen in "Cleanliness is Next to Edness"), which makes it possible for him to clean the one he wore the previous day. --Antoshi~! ^{T | C} 04:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not Again...

what exactly is the point of creating the seperate Characters of Ed, Edd n Eddy article? --Phil 02:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The characters section made this article really long. By the way, many other TV shows are like this, for example Family Guy, Futurama, and Fullmetal Alchemist. a thing 03:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your point, but if I may point out, those shows don't have a fixed amount of characters --Phil 23: 24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

"It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Ed, Edd n Eddy. (Discuss)"

Which is exactly the way it was. I don't know of another article on Wikipedia that gets screwed with as much as this article. It was at one point concise and well written, but the 10 year olds just can't leave well enough alone. -- 172.193.239.237 02:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Innuendo

is anyone considering adding a passage on the innuendo in the show? they do have quite a running gag with pornographic magazines.

okay, since the last guy/kid who made the Innuendo article had bad grammar skills and based the second contribution off his opinion ("i think this means crack"), I fixed it -posted by Star_9

I think the whole section is full of POV from some people who find the most subtle things perverted. I recommend deleting it with extreme prejudice. --Philo 05:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I think I heard in an episode that the kanker sisters were actually cousins, hence the three dads.

okay, i'm gonna delete the big chin thing. the innuedo article is for things that are definitly sexual innuedos, not stupid coincedences-Star_9

Philo, did you delete the article? probably for the best, 10 year olds were just gonna keep filling it up with crap-Star_9

Cleaned up once again

Jimmy was effeminate again, Rolf was from Norway again... does the attack of the 10 year olds ever stop? -Elaich 08:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)-[reply]

Actually, jimmy is somewhat effeminate, especially in later episodes. I don't see the problem. --Philo 11:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He does say "I'm so dainty" and things like that........

I am not going to allow an 8 year old to be described as "effiminate." 8 year olds should not be described in sexist terms, even if they are cartoon characters. "Childish" certainly describes Jimmy, but "effeminate" is a perception that not all share, and should not be used to describe Jimmy, since it is an opinion and a perception.

A message to my fans (FRADULENT)

NOTE: It has been personally requested by none other than Danny Antonucci himself (via Edtropolis) that this entry be removed. I made the point that we do not delete matter from discussion pages. I COULD do it ( and get a warning from a moderator) but I think that leaving it here will serve the purpose of the discussion page much better. Others that may want to impersonate Danny might read this, and be warned that we can verify the truthfulness of it. -- Elaich 19:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I could have never forseen the Eds would be this popular! EEnE are even the subject of fan speculation! Just like Star Wars!

I would like to thank all the fans on behalf of the Eds and the kids. But not the adults, dudes, not the adults! The adults are never seen and aren't even minor characters, so what's this business about "Eudora" or "Great Nano"? I would think the Ediholics would be much more wiser to include the essentials and not fanfiction.

--152.163.101.14 06:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry y'all, I forgot to log in.

--Danny Antonucci 06:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ZephyrSamba here - I hate to burst any bubbles but please be aware that this message has been verified as false; Danny Antonucci did NOT write it. As proof I can cite head writer Rachel Connor's message on the matter over at Earth to Edd: "Hey guys. Dan Sioui (AKA producer) emailed Kit this morning (and CCed me) letting her know that the wiki post claiming to be Danny is complete and utter...say it with me... BUNK." [1] I can also cite the letter from Dan Sioui, which Kit shared with me: "Hi Kit, I spoke with Danny about this blog recently and it is NOT Danny.Can you please remove it from the list?" As I'm not exactly up to snuff on Wikipedia etiquette I'm loath to delete this comment altogether but I hope that someone who IS a regular maintainer of the Eds section here will go ahead and delete it on behalf of AKA. Any questions, I'm happy to discuss. Zeph 20:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)ZephyrSamba[reply]

Thank you. We don't delete discussion page posts, but your input is well noted and appreciated. It is noted that someone impersonated Danny Antonucci. -- Elaich 05:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That IP he signed in his first message comes from Virginia, not Canada. So its fake.

fetish?

I read awhile back in Ed's bio, on the Ed Edd 'n' Eddy page, that Ed had a "fetish" for chickens. fetish means a sexual desire for someone/something, so I changed it to "Ed loves chickens" but somebody deleted that too. I think we should at least mention it, but no crap like sexual desires for them. - Star_9 (Not Logged In)

Yeah, you're correct about that, even though Eddy once found a magazine under Ed's bed called "Chicks!" and it was full of photos of chickens. The problem is that few adolescent minds can comprehend the sly, subtle humor behind references like that, and take it to mean that "Ed is turned on by chickens!" Thus, they jump to all kinds of conclusions and do a major edit of the page. I merely decided to add the line, "Ed loves buttered toast, gravy, and chickens." Approved? -- Elaich 04:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so let's do this right. We're supposed to discuss edits here. I did a mild edit under Rolf, Sarah, and Nazz. Just a bit of grammer tune up, mainly. Tell me what you think. -- Elaich 04:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, fetish is a love of an inanimate object, the other fetish being sexual fetish. Still, the use of fetish would have been incorrect for describing ed's love of chickens. --Philo 13:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

alright, great job guys - Star_9 (Not Logged In)

OK... now the vandal is erasing posts from this page. NOT COOL. (Sorry, forgot to log in to post this Thursday night. It all got a bit confusing.) -- Elaich 23:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

if he is deleting posts, when need to find out who he is and get the mod's attention. NOBODY has the right to delete comments

Somone added a comment about Ed being stupid. I deleted it because it was not well written at all... but then, after reading Ed's bio, I noticed that nothing was said about Ed's apparent stupidity. Thus, I added:

"Ed is one of those people who seems on the surface to be stupid, but is really living in an alternate reality."

Is this acceptable? It really needs to be mentioned. Ed at times has shown himself to be quite bright, but it's always about something that has nothing to do with what's going on at the moment. Ed is a perfect example of "alternate reality." Comments? -- Elaich 17:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

....what?

Ed, Edd n Eddy: Needs to be glorified

Ed, Edd n Eddy is the best animated comedy, so why did Spongebob Squarepants win the Best Cartoon on the Kids' Choice Awards? Ed, Edd n Eddy, I feel, is underrated and needs to be glorified! ED, EDD N EDDY ARE THE BEST! -User:Ed-kipedia

1. the Kids choice awards are on nickelodeon

2. Glorify it anywhere except on wikipedia. --Philo 17:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox — a thing 08:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Guys, I think we have some vandals on our hands. Do you agree? If you do, let's discuss an ultimate way to stop it. T-borg 20:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to stop it is to revert the article to what seems to be a well written Wiki piece. There is no "ultimate" way to stop it, except to revert it to what has been accepted. Occasionally, someone adds something to this article that meets Wiki standards and is relevant, but most edits of this article are either vandalism, fancruft, or POV. - Elaich 09:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. But are we adding tags for vandalism? I mean, is it necessary?(Sorry, I'm still quite new to Wikipedia.)T-borg 17:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

speaking of vandalism, why is the article titled "Ed, Edd 'n' Eddy" when it's supposed to be "Ed, Edd n Eddy". The latter is how it appears on the show's title card for chrissakes. --Philo 00:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What did they do? Did I do something wrong? (Plainnym 21:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Games

Please stop using video games as sources for information, like the oft posted "Edd is really bald under his hat because it was so in this game." Games are not canon, and are irrelevant to this article. Elaich 00:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

will whoever's making up names of episodes stop! if those names are confirmed at least cite your sources

That's it!

Now this is really too much! "He has a auto green ford explorer which costed him $24,000, he has 14 records of american Bruce Springsteen."? Where do these people get these ideas? Someone tag this page for restricted editing NOW!!! T-borg 21:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin DOES NOT watch 60 Minutes

What's with all this bullcrap about Kevin watching 60 Minutes? I've watched just about every episode and none of them say he does. Plus, if he does, that would be copyright infringment. --Plainnym 13:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will honor the source, but I still say he doesn't watch it. --Plainnym 13:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For this to be in the article it must be seen in or spoken of in aleast 2-3 episodes. If you've watched most of them you still might haven't seen them. Try checking on http://www.tv.com/. But I will be removing that about Kevin. If it is true, then someone can always revert it. T-borg 14:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I saw or heard Kevin watch 60 Minutes, then I would let it be in the article. Plus, even though the official website says it, it may not be true. --Plainnym 14:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed's Mom

OK, is she or is she not an unseen character? Figure it out already!T-borg 10:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes she is! In "Rock-a-bye Ed" it was just Jonny in drag. (Plainnym 14:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

That's exactly why I'm bringing her back. Thanks. But seriously man, this article really needs protection!T-borg 18:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed's mom is NOT an unseen character. There is no definition of her personality in any way, except that she turns a blind eye to Sarah's tattling. There are details revealed about Eddy's brother and others so that we can get an idea of what they are really like even though we never see them. Not true with Ed's mother.her hand was seen in the report card episode so she has been seen.

Reverted to eliminate another outbreak of fancruft and POV. -- Elaich 15:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I give up! You figure it out!(Sorry but it's really too much) T-borg 17:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The KKK?!?!

"Klu Klux Klan awarded this best white cartoon in year 2004."

WHO THE CRAP WROTE THIS!!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!? (Plainnym 14:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

It's so funny even funnier than EEnE is Chuck Norris's favorite cartoon !

Should this be removed

In "Hands Across Ed", at the auditions, after banishing Rolf after his disconcerting dance of the hairless otter, Eddy whispers to Edd, "No budget for subtitles!"

Eddy isn't refering to the actual show, he was refering to his scam to put them in a show.

I think there is getting to be too many entries under "Trivia" to begin with. While pop culture references are interesting, it goes beyond the scope of an encyclopedia to try and list all of them. I didn't delete any of them, though - yet.

"We also find out that his middle name is "Maryann" in one particular episode."

Who in the world posts this crap?

Cartoon Network official bios

Please stop posting the Cartoon Network official bios. If you will read the page you are cutting and pasting them from, you will see that they are (copyright) Cartoon Network. Wikipedia prohibits posting of copyrighted material. - Elaich 00:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a blog

Just the facts, ma'am. That's what an encyclopedia is. People keep adding trivia, cruft, things that happened in one episode only that are not relevant to the whole picture, etc. - 71.139.246.169 14:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why Do People Keep On Making Up Episodes?

Everytime i come to this article there are always fake episode names on here who in the world keeps doing this?

The same reason that people continue to post cruft on an almost daily basis - they don't understand what an encyclopedia is. "In this episode, Ed proved himself to be an excellent flute player" = cruft. Why? It only happened in one episode, in a cartoon which is famous for bending it's own reality in a single episode for the storyline. It is also irrelevant. In contrast, "Edd is an excellent pedal guitar player" refers to a number of episodes - hence, is fact.

"In the episode "A Pinch to Grow an Ed" when the Eds were launched into near space it did reveal that they were falling back into Georgia." More cruft, and irrelevant. Deleted (again.)

Minor edits

I made some minor corrections to the grammar in this article. I am noting it here because of the various issues noted here on the talk page with vandalism L Ecker

Looks fine. I believe the original writer was British, which accounted for a bit of the odd grammer. BTW, I noticed it was changed to "believes Plank SAYS things. "Sees" is actually correct, and was a direct quote from Jonny. I changed it back to "sees." -- Elaich 15:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lets get this straight!

In the List of unseen characters all characters, mentioned in the Unseen characters section are actually "unseen", so let's stop removing it anymore OK? T-borg 21:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The only unseen character in EEnE is Eddy's brother. None of the rest have any personality defined, and are only referred to in passing, so they are not characters. A "character" must have an ongoing presence, and must have a defined, recognizable personality, which does not fit any of the parents, Great Nano, or Nana. Eddy's brother does fit that description. BTW, why do you keep posting your user name when you are no longer registered? -- Elaich 02:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Question

I saw an episode of Ed, Edd, and Eddy today, and the information you have on how plank received his chip is rather inaccurate...

Jonny has a flashback where Plank wanted to be a piston in Rolf's tractor, and that's where he received his chip. -- Screen317 23:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And, how did he receive the chip? He went flying and got stuck between Rolf's teeth, which is exactly what the article states. How is that inaccurate? -- Elaich 15:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]