Talk:Edward the Seventh

Television: British Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the British television task force.

More information:
/
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A character or cast section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs expansion or clean up. Ideally, this section will be written in prose following the Television Manual of Style and remembering to adhere to the fiction guidelines.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.
	A plot summary needs to be added to this television show article, or the current one needs to be expanded.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

Is the TV series the primary meaning of "Edward the Seventh". Surely the king himself should be? PatGallacher (talk) 19:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Late reply - you will notice that there is a hatnote at the top of this article linking to the kings wikiarticle. That article follows WikiP's naming convention guidelines so it is unlikely that its title will ever be changed to where it conflicts with this article. MarnetteD | Talk 16:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cigar

So, if this article is about the TV series, and the hatnote points at the king, where do I go to read about the cigar? That's what I came here for. 74.131.53.1 (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no article for the cigar. The closed it comes to any mention on WikiP is this list List of cigar brands. If an article ever is created then we can add another hatnote to this page or start a dismbig page but IMO there is no need to do either at this time. MarnetteD | Talk

Thanks! Incidentally, I'm a little surprised that the cigar doesn't have its own article (given the brand's own ubiquity and the ubiquity of Wikipedia articles about consumer products), but I'll agree that I don't feel like it's really necessary either. 74.131.53.1 (talk) 19:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dagmar/Minnie/Empress Dowager

Remember watching this as a boy, and saw it all again on YouTube in 2015. I remember noticing the girl from "Only Fools and Horses" ("What else was she in? Oh that's who it is!") and looking up that she was somebody called "Dagmar". Another book I'm reading at the moment informs me that she was engaged to the older brother of the future Alexander III before he died, so she then married the latter (Catherine of Aragon style). She thus became Empress of Russia, then Empress Dowager after 1894, and was then the one rescued on HMS Marlborough after the Revolution. So, to come to the point, I reckon Gwyneth Strong and Jean Lapotaire are playing the same person at different stages of life.

Feel free to correct if I'm wrong. I confess I get all these lesser royals muddled up ... Paulturtle (talk) 10:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]