Talk:Elizabeth "Harriot" Wilson

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Harriot

When I began this article lo those many years ago, I swear the title had "Harriot" in parentheses. To give the name without them suggests that Harriot was the girl's middle name, but this was not the case. The individual of the historical record was simply Elizabeth Wilson. "Harriot" (always spelled that way, not Harriet) might be described as a literary alias used by publishers as the factual Elizabeth's story became increasingly fictionalized. I don't know how to change the actual title, other than moving the entire text to a new article with the correct title, and placing a "redirect" here. If anyone has a better solution I'd greatly appreciate it. PurpleChez (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration

I moved the text of this article from "Elizabeth Harriot Wilson" back to this slot, with the parentheses in the title. I sincerely apologize if there is a Wikipedia format issue of which I'm not aware, and if there is I will be happy to learn more about it. Otherwise, the comment that the parentheses don't belong is incorrect. Without the parentheses, "Harriot" looks like a middle name, which it is not. It is more of a literary alias, used by publishers as the true story of Elizabeth became increasingly fictionalized into something else. Again...if there is a formatting issue of which I'm unaware I apologize and look forward to learning about it. Thank you. PurpleChez (talk) 19:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Harriot Wilson

May I ask why you moved Elizabeth Harriot Wilson back to the version with parentheses? As a person who needs a better social life, and who spams the Random Button WAY more than can be healthy, I must say I've never seen any page that has the middle name in parenthesis. Unless there's a section in article names that I've missed, shouldn't it be without parenthesis? -WarthogDemon 01:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated on the "discussion" page, 'Harriot' is NOT a middle name. It might best be described as a literary alias. The historical figure was known as simply Elizabeth Wilson, with no middle name as far as I know. (Apparently a common thing at the time...look at all the presidents who didn't have middle names....) Anyhoo...it appears that as her story became increasingly fictionalized she came to be called "Harriot Wilson", and her brother William became "Amos Wilson". Neither Harriot nor Amos are middle names. The need to be set off with parentheses or maybe quotation marks (a la Larry "Bud" Melman) so that they don't look like middle names.

We could check with an admin to be sure, but I'm 99% positive if that's the case, then the title should become something like: Elizabeth Wilson (folklore) and then at the beginning of the article it would read: Elizabeth "Harriot" Wilson". -WarthogDemon 05:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That'd be cool. PurpleChez (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]