Talk:Esquisse d'un Programme

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

Please provide specific suggestions or critique in order to be able to improve the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bci2 (talk • contribs)

It is hard to tell you what to fix, I don't even understand what the article is about. The first paragraph of the article is supposed to summarize the article. In this case the first paragraph talks about what the article is not and what it is not going to talk about. Jons63 (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Already done here, right after the article was deleted for the second time. Your efforts are appreciated - we all want to make Wikipedia a better resource - but I don't see a whole lot of evidence that you're trying to learn about how articles are written around here. Frank | talk 18:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Quote Marks

The second half of the Brief History section of this article is a long quoted statement. It's unclear to me if those quotes are necessary, and if they are, what is being quoted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nwalton125 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic section

The section on Extensions of Galois's theory for groups seems to be a poor exposition. I don't see how it could be useful for someone who didn't already know what was involved - several strands of ideas are there, rather indiscriminately put together. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Esquisse d'un Programme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120722054515/http://www.bangor.ac.uk/r.brown/pstacks.htm to http://www.bangor.ac.uk/r.brown/pstacks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]