This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the OKA task force page of WikiProject Intertranswiki.Intertranswiki/OKAWikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKATemplate:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKAOKA articles
English wikipedia does not refer to people by their first name, even though the practice is prevalent in Brazil
Make sure the patronyms are handled correctly
"Decree-law" is just strange and distracting; if there is concern for accuracy or verifiability, use the exact foreign-language title.
way too many commas
Avoid euphemisms like "military movement" for coup. It is better to be understood than to translate literally
Blogs are almost never acceptable sources on en.wikipedia. I will check the tagged references before I delete them though
Do not wikilink country names unless the country is doing something in the text. Not if it's just an adjective denoting the origin of someone or something
There is a limit to how much can legitimately be quoted in back to back blockquotes. Yes, it's quoted so it probably isn't *illegal* to do that, but that's low bar. Quotes need to be integrated into original writing.
If there is an English-language article it is usually better to use it, and its title, rather than pipe the English article to the Portugues name. Very few English speakers can read Portuguese at even an elementary level.
While not strictly speaking required, a translation of reference titles is strongly recommended for readability
Passive tense a problem, probably stems from overly literal translation.