Jump to content

Talk:Etraveli Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Visa

[edit]

Need help 2.98.196.143 (talk) 08:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GoToGate and Etraveli Group

[edit]

Hello editors! My name is Sayna, I am an employee of Etraveli Group which (as this article states) is the parent company of GoToGate. Etraveli Group does not have its own Wikipedia page but it seems that much of the information about it has been placed in this article instead. As a result, this article is not very well focused.

I have two proposals to make and I would love editors' input on next steps. I would like to suggest that this article be moved to Etraveli Group, rather than have two articles floating around, with GoToGate getting a section in the moved article. Additionally, I have a draft of the content for what an Etraveli Group article could look like. I have a draft in my user space.

What's the best way to proceed first: propose an update to this existing article based on my draft, or formally seek a move? Thank you for the assistance, Sayna At Etraveli (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sayna At Etraveli, I think it makes sense to do two things here:
1. Submit a move request to change the name
2. Submit a new Edit Request afterwards that incorporates your new draft content
Let me know if you need any help. Feel free to tag me. --FeldBum (talk) 23:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I'm marking this as done, as the page was moved. — BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 12:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GoToGateEtraveli Group – GoToGate is a part of Etraveli Group and this article has been used to house information about Etraveli Group, to the point that this article now has two info boxes. Per the suggestion from FeldBum, I would like to make this move request and later propose a draft to re-shift the focus to Etraveli Group, which has more and better information about it in reliable sourcing, including in Reuters, Financial Times and Bloomberg. Sayna At Etraveli (talk) 09:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as this article is primarily about the Etraveli Group and not just GoToGate. -- FeldBum (talk) 13:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Refocusing this article

[edit]

Hello editors! I am glad to see the move request was implemented. As previously mentioned, I have a draft in my user space I would like editors to consider. This draft shifts the focus onto the parent company Etraveli Group without removing well sourced information about GoToGate. It additionally fills in some gaps in information. Please let me know what editors think (FeldBum perhaps this interests you as well?) Thanks! Sayna At Etraveli (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll take a look. It might be easier to make line-by-line requests, but let me check your draft first. --FeldBum (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's some good stuff here, but you also remove some things on the page that would need to stay and there are lines that would not be considered NPOV. I think line-by-line requests would be the best approach here @Sayna At Etraveli. I'm happy to answer the request when you post it (and feel free to tag me). --FeldBum (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]