Talk:Euparkeria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Euparkeria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Euparkeria is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

retention of bipedalism

maybe a preciosity, but wouldn't be more adequate to say that bipedalism was retained in crocodylomorphs than in crocodilians, since the latter is a narrower group, and the contingent group already contains some bipedal croc-likes? (Saltoposuchus, Macelognathus, etc) --Extremophile 19:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Of course there is ambiguity in the text between the traditional and the modern phylogenetic sense, as a defined clade.--MWAK (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Role of Euparkeria in the science of bird orgins

Broom (1913) discovered the first strong evidence to support a thecodont origin for birds when he described Euparkeria as ancestral not only to birds but also to dinosaurs (Feduccia, 1996). Dingus and Rowe (1998) say that Euparkeria has long reigned as the most important discovery of the twentieth century in terms of archosaur evolution and the origin of birds. The theory that birds evolved with dinosaurs from thecodonts like Euparkeria is supported by the homological study of Tarsitano and Hecht (1980) and the changing views on the origin of appendages discussed by Laurin (2006).

Broom, R. 1913. Note on Mesosuchus browni, Watson and on a new South African Triassic pseudosuchian (Euparkeria capensis). Records of the Albany Museum 2: 394–396.

Dingus L, and T Rowe. The mistaken extinction: dinosaur evolution and the origin of bird. 1998: New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Feduccia A. The origin and evolution of birds. 1996: New Haven: Yale University Press.

Laurin, M. (2006). Scanty evidence and changing opinions about evolving appendages. — Zoologica Scripta, 35, 667–668.

Tarsitano S, and Hecht MK. A reconsideration of the reptilian relationships of Archaeopteryx. 1980. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 69: 257-263. In: Feduccia 1996: p 70. 72.194.116.63 16:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Vahe Demirjian 09.06 15 April 2007[reply]

As long as you keep in mind that nothing in the morphology of Euparkeria indicates that birds would not be dinosaurs... :o)--MWAK (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Euparkeria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050409174045/http://www.palaeos.com/vertebrates/Units/270Archosauromorpha/270.400.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/270Archosauromorpha/270.400.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]