Talk:European Individual Chess Championship

Televised

Is it televised? 195.188.112.2 (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Nazi tournament in 1942

I think the following text is somewhat problematic, quote: The last opinion is curious as Alekhine (World Champion), Keres (pretendent for the title), Bogoljubow (former World Champion challenger), Stoltz (winner, ahead of Alekhine, at Munich 1941), and Junge (co-winner, with Alekhine, at Prague 1942) made Munich 1942 the world's strongest tournament in 1942. The next-strongest tournaments were Salzburg 1942, New York (US Championship) 1942, Mar del Plata 1942, Prague (Duras Memorial) 1942, and Moscow (Championship) 1942.

1) Apart from Keres none of the other players was exactly world's top class. Bogoljubov was what, 53 years old in 1942 and was way past his prime then. Stoltz and Junge? Give me a break. 2) The fact that there were no other stronger tournaments in 1942 doesn't mean that the tournament had a very strong line up.

Anyway I think there is a problem in giving the Nazi-organized bogus "European Championship" such a prominence in this article and I propose either removing or axing down the section to a sentence or two. Dr. Loosmark 19:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. It's certainly a problem just on the grounds that this is WP:SYNTH and basically an editorial opinion. If we have a source that critiques Fine's comment we could mention it and attribute it to the source. We actually don't seem to have a source for the Fine comment either, so even though I think it's very possible that Fine did write that, it should be sourced or removed too. Quale (talk) 01:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Women's bronze

FIDE has the tournament results in an Excel spreadsheet linked from this page: http://www.fide.com/index.php?option=com_fidecalendar&view=archiveview&aid=206. It looks to me like Lilit Mkrtchian (ARM) did place 3rd on tiebreak out of 9 players on 7.5 points. Natalia Zukhova was one of the 9 on 7.5, but her tiebreak score was 9th place. Quale (talk) 03:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it seems it wasn't necessarily tiebreak but perhaps playoffs. TWIC 598 has the results after playoffs which agree with FIDE. The link that was in the article was TWIC 597 which doesn't show the tiebreak. Quale (talk) 03:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Individual Chess Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/20080720065957/http://www.ruschess.com/Archive/2000/EuroMen/table.html to http://www.ruschess.com/Archive/2000/EuroMen/table.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]