Talk:FortisBC

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Okanagan Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Okanagan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Okanagan and Okanogan regions of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, United States, in addition to their native people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OkanaganWikipedia:WikiProject OkanaganTemplate:WikiProject OkanaganOkanagan articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Corporate Focus

This page reads like it was written by the PR Department at Fortis.

FortisBC is less than 10 years old and has bought its aquisitions.

West Kootenay Power built dams and electrified the West Kootanays for 90 years and there is very little written here about that history. I think a separate article would be appropriate.Dougmcdonell (talk) 08:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FortisBC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629182930/http://www.virtualmuseum.ca/Exhibitions/Hydro/en/dams/index.php to http://virtualmuseum.ca/Exhibitions/Hydro/en/dams/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (August 2023)

This article is written in chunks by several single-purpose accounts, some of whom have usernames suggesting they are under the employ of FortisBC. This has resulted in a press release-like tone to the article, and includes, amongst other things, greenwashing and several instances of undue weight

For instance, the lede includes a section on renewable natural gas, in a way that gives it a bigger proportion of the lede while it represents less than 1% of total gas provided. Contrast 0.7 PJ of RNG [1] vs. 230PJ of total natural gas. [2]. The first figure is no longer being provided after 2021.

Article needs significant cleanup of corporate POV issues and undue weight. Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've spent a few hours cleaning it all up. The article is now no longer solely a PR piece. There are still some outstanding concerns about undue weight, mainly that the LNG facilities seem to need fleshing out with more information. As-is the hydroelectricity section is larger than the gas infrastructure, despite being a much smaller part of the energy provided. It would perhaps be a good idea to merge the facilities section with the energy provided sections, since they overlap in coverage a bit.

Unrelated to the undue weight issues, the company history section needs to be converted to prose and updated. Sourcing is likewise problematic throughout the entire article. Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 17:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]