Jump to content

Talk:Francisco Javier López Peña

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Definition of volunteer

[edit]

Dear Mr: Estalentau:

According to the wikipedia version of volunteer the DEFINITION of the word (as opposed to some private person's explanation in the intro) comes from: "word comes from Latin, and can be translated as "will" (as in doing something out of ones own free will)."

Furthermore, "BY DEFINITION (emphasis added), a volunteer worker does not get paid or receive compensation for services rendered other than reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses.[1]"

Now, out of this description what part doesn't fit into the part that Lopez Pena was a volunteer. Obviously some sources think he is a terrorist (spanish govt) and some think he is a revolutionary (ETA), but as wikipedia's encyclopedic authority we should mantain a more neutral definition, no? Lihaas (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lihaas, It is crystal clear Lopez Pena is a volunteer. No debate. However, he voluntarily joined a terrorist organization (ETA). Hence for clarity’s sake, he has to be named as terrorist.

“as wikipedia's encyclopedic authority we should mantain a more neutral definition, no?”

Don’t know about you, but I am an authority of nothing. Instead of rambling, we would better stick with ETA’s definition as terrorist group issued by reliable authorities such as UN and European Union. --Estalentau (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr: Estalentau:
The UN doesn't maintain a list of organizations as such, so I don't know where you get that from. The EU is a body representative of its members, so it is naturally going to espouse what spain demands.
Nonetheless, there are extralegal entities that don't consider them terrorists. Don't get me wrong here, I'm not saying they're revolutionaries or such. I'm merely saying BOTH sides inhibit a bias.
Perhaps you have another term more neutral. But terrorist and revolutionary are also biases on 2 different sides.
Lihaas (talk) 11:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove of infobox

[edit]

Someone has edited out the old infobox, while it may be correct that the it wasnt the best infobox, can we have some debate and discuss things before major changes?Lihaas (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Francisco Javier López Peña. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Francisco Javier López Peña. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francisco Javier López Peña. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]