Talk:Free Software Magazine

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

From the owner

Hey, this is Tony Mobily, I created Free Software Magazine. I took the tag about lack of references off... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercmobily (talk • contribs) 16:18, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Free Software Daily

Towards the end of 2007 FSDaily and Free Software Magazine were no longer directly connected. As such it may be prudent to remove the FSDaily stuff from this page and start a new page (if it is considered noteworthy) for FSD. Crimperman (talk) 13:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

I think it's all about done... can the tag be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewmin (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs

Probably should mention that blogs are becoming a bigger part of the web site... Scott Carpenter 20:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We Recommend?

The "If you like this we also recommend" heading seems a bit Hitchhiker's Guide to me. I reckon it should probably be "See Also" - any thoughts? --Ruaraidh-dobson 22:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Makes a Magazine a Magazine?

Looks like the most recent issue of FSM is #22, in 2008. Since that date, isn't it more fairly described as just a Web site, irrespective of the site's name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.144.195.190 (talk) 08:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FSM cover issue 011.gif

Image:FSM cover issue 011.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This magazine seems to be defunct

Their latest post is from June, 2015 (~2 years old). Hence, the article needs to be edited accordingly, and this needs to be mentioned.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Free Software Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]