Jump to content

Talk:Fugger family

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Initial comments

[edit]

Nicknamed 'the rich fugger' - that can't be serious. --Pengutron (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest thing about the Fugger family is that they were important bankers in the late 16th century and early 17th century... a fact whic the article never mentions (it stops in the early 16th century). The article should be extended to included the most important part of this family's history. -- 08:41, 9 October 2006 67.160.106.255

Agree -- the so-called "Fugger news-letters" of the late 16th / early 17th should also be mentioned... AnonMoos (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also important is what happened to the family fortune. Did the bankruptcy of Philip II ruin the family? Myron (talk) 13:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fugger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

With all seriousness I can muster: the German Wikipedia mentions the original writing of the name Fugger, wich was Fucker [ˈfʊkɐ] when they arrived in Augsburg. Worth mentioning? Struthio Ostrich (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:German States Fugger 1621 10 Ducats.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 12, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-03-12. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fugger family

The Fugger family was a German upper-bourgeois family based in Augsburg that was a prominent group of European merchants and bankers who controlled much of the European economy in the 16th century and accumulated enormous wealth. This ten-ducat gold coin was struck by the family in 1621 for the County of Kirchberg and Weissenhorn, which they ruled from 1536 to 1806.

Coin design credit: County of Kirchberg and Weissenhorn; photographed by the National Numismatic Collection

Recently featured:

Needs to be a good byword on the Fugger coat of arms. Why the armless black woman wearing a pope hat and why the Fleur de Lys?

[edit]

Needs to be a good byword on the Fugger coat of arms. Why the armless black woman wearing a pope hat and why the Fleur de Lys? 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:87:ECF4:D7C9:3C76 (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source for mining in Scandinavia?

[edit]

Hi, the article isn't exactly bristling with references. I'd be interested in refs for the title of this post. T 2A02:FE1:E16B:CC00:DA63:B162:420A:CA58 (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]