Talk:Garachi

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romani people Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romani people, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romani people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Romani peopleWikipedia:WikiProject Romani peopleTemplate:WikiProject Romani peopleRomani people articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If they are Dom they are not Romani

The Domari left India at a completely different time period to that of the later leaving Romani. The two different groups speak different languages to one another from different regions and time periods. Domari speak a much earlier language that lacks the major Rajasthani and Panjabi influences.

They are therefore not Romani people but are Domari. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.227.166 (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the article appears to claim that there is a group of Romani Garachi, distinct from the Dom Garachi. I find this dubious, and insufficiently referenced. The Dom people are often inaccurately subsumed under "Roma", so that simply providing a quote calling them "Roma" would be insufficient. We need a source explicitly confirming that there are two groups. --dab (𒁳) 09:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garachi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215455/http://www.echo-az.com/archive/2006_12/1481/obshestvo06.shtml to http://www.echo-az.com/archive/2006_12/1481/obshestvo06.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]