Talk:Gary Lambert (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

"Controversy" section

The "Controversy" section recently added by User:Minority Reporters seems to be disproportionate to the rest of the article. Read Wikipedia:Controversy sections for why this is a problem. The question, then, is how to fix it. Should the section be removed or rewritten, or should more positive material be added to balance it out? I'm leaning towards the latter, seeing how short the article already is, but I am unsure as to what positive material exists that could be used for this purpose... Perhaps something from the Concord Monitor's endorsement of Lambert? Link: Editorial: Lambert is the right choice for the GOP. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 17:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]