Talk:Ghostly International

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Grand Valley State University#New Music Ensemble|Grand Valley State New Music Ensemble]] The anchor (#New Music Ensemble) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Merger proposal

I suggest that Sam Valenti IV be merged into this page. The subject matter overlap of the two articles is almost 100%. They both cite to the same sources as well. Sam Valenti IV's notability (as far as I can tell) derives entirely from his founding of Ghostly International, and the standalone Sam Valenti IV article adds nothing but a brief bit of backstory, which could easily be incorporated here. If there is something further notable to be said about Sam Valenti IV, then please, someone add it; otherwise there's no reason to maintain separate articles. Sam Valenti IV would thereafter redirect here. Comments, please. JohnInDC (talk) 14:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's safe to conclude from the absence of outraged commentary, that this is at least not a bad idea. I've woven in a bit about Sam Valenti here, the non-redundant parts at least, to see how it reads. JohnInDC (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I finished it up this morning. JohnInDC (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]