Talk:Goldstar (beer)

Untitled

I can't find the source right now, but i remember reading it's the No. 1 selling beer in Israel (and has been for years). Anyway, it's my own favourite beer (but that's POV :-) Coredumb 11:48, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

10 oct editing.

i aded some details from the back of a goldstar bottel.

should we mention that this beer nearly tops the truly disgusting beer list?

Fair use rationale for Image:Goldstar light beer.jpg

Image:Goldstar light beer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Goldstar beer can.jpg

Image:Goldstar beer can.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Lyrics

Per this RfC, content of this sort requires reliable secondary sourcing that establishes the significance of the reference. Citations to lyric sites, no matter how many, cannot meet that standard. This content should be left out unless/until the standard can be met. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Nikkimaria, first you didn't like it because it was unsourced, and now you complain there are too many (primary) sources. This is a three sentence stub of an article, from which you're adamantly trying to remove one. The RfC you quote was meant to deal with articles that have an excessive, and often irrelevantly long list of cultural references and other aspects of dubious encyclopaedic value, not with three-sentence stubs struggling to keep some content.

I know you feel you must have the last say in every dispute, which is what got you admonished by Arbcom in 2013, and forced you to "voluntarily" desysop yourself the following year to avoid further sanctions. Why not dedicate your time to actually improving articles, rather than blindly and indiscriminately enforcing irrelevant RfCs? Is this one of those "slippery slope" arguments, where if you don't eradicate that cultural reference from this stub, who knows what will come next?

Put down your scissors, pick up a pen, and add something of value to the project. Owen× ☎ 12:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

I've now expanded the article with appropriate sources. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Good job. Owen× ☎ 17:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)