Jump to content

Talk:Gooba

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk20:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Lk95 (talk) and AshMusique (talk). Nominated by Nice4What (talk) at 23:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - In the article, it is thoroughly cited, which is fine. Ignore the 'x'.
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 06:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for redoing this review. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 19:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I request an edit .Can I edit where it says label ? I want to add Create Music Group to there .

[edit]

Can I edit where it says label ? I want to add Create Music Group because that is 6ix9ine's label . Branwen Brettle (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Please provide a reliable source that supports this information. (I removed the one that was there for the same reason). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 May 2020

[edit]

Article states the security of 6ix9ine are seen in the music video, citing insider.com (https://www.insider.com/tekashi-6ix9ine-gooba-music-video-livestream-snitching-prison-release-2020-5?amp) which make the claim. When going to the moment in the video, where insider.com say - during the ankle monitor moment, security are not seen but crew of the video covered in paint. The article is making a false statement.

Moment when the video claims: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPw_izFr5PA&feature=youtu.be&t=118

No security is seen. Boggit Meister (talk) 02:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Moreover, if you want to challenge sourced material, you'll need to provide other sources that contradict it. Your own analysis constitutes original research. Moremoreover, the Insider piece says nothing about where in the video this happens, so the lack of appearance at one particular timestamp doesn't mean much. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belle Delphine cover

[edit]

I saw a cover mentioned. I think Belle Delphine's cover, that has 51 million views its worth noticing here by its relevance to the main article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL470fJMi7w 90.170.23.52 (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Her remix/parody called "I'm Back" would be mentioned if it was discussed in WP:SECONDARY sources published by reliable platforms. I saw the views were up to 776,000, not even a million. The number of views is not enough by itself. Binksternet (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]