Talk:Google Docs

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

SBCornelius (talk · contribs) has been paid by Outspoken Media, on behalf of Google. COI declared: Also see User:SBCornelius

Recreation of Google Docs Page

This page was created by splitting the current Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides page. I also created pages for Google Sheets, Google Slides, and Google Forms. The Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides page still exists, but I propose deleting that article if we can arrive at a consensus. All information was retained and nothing added in the split. This brings the structure of these products in line with how code fuzz in shopAdobe Creative Suite and Microsoft Office products are structured on Wikipedia. It is also intended to clear up use of "Google Docs" in reference to all Google Drive apps collectively when it references only the word processor app in the Google Drive Suite. SBCornelius (talk) 19:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

SBCornelius, I propose that Google Sheets, Google Slides, Google Drawings and Google Forms be merged into Google Docs. Google host ALL of those services under the [1] domain, which clearly implies they are a part of Google Docs, see [2] [3] [4] [5]. Many sections of Google Sheets, Google Slides and Google Docs are almost the same or are identical to each other. All these services are apart of "Google Docs" but "Google Docs" also referers to the word editor, which would have a section in the broader "Google Docs" article.– BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 13:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BrandonXLF, thanks for the input. The discussion of the individual apps seemed somewhat limited when these articles were merged on the old Docs, Sheets, and Slides page. Even though there are similarities in the articles as they are today, those differences will lessen as edits are made and each article grows on its own. This structure also mirrors the exact article structure used for Adobe, Microsoft, and other similar software companies -- company article (Google, Adobe Systems, Microsoft), suite or cloud access article (Google Drive, Adobe Creative Suite, Adobe Creative Cloud, Microsoft Office), and articles for individual apps or programs (Google Docs, Google Sheets, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Microsoft Powerpoint, Microsoft Excel). Also, both Adobe and Microsoft host all products on the same domain or subdomain as well.

products.office.com/en-us/powerpoint
products.office.com/en-us/excel
products.office.com/en-us/word

www.adobe.com/products/audition.html
www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html
www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html

www.google.com/sheets/about/
www.google.com/docs/about/
www.google.com/slides/about/
www.google.com/forms/about/

When signed in and using one of the apps like Sheets, you will be on docs.google.com/spreadsheets/, but the use of the docs subdomain here is just technical debt. The old combined article for Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides reflected what the apps were a decade ago, but I think moving to the structure used for Microsoft and Adobe is a better way to organize the information about how the Drive Suite is used today. Thanks again for the feedback and please let me know your thoughts. SBCornelius (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SBCornelius, Like Adobe and Microsoft Office, there's an article about the entire suite, Google doesn't currently have one, I think if they're to be separate there should be an article about all of them (the suite as an whole). Do you know what this should be called, I was thinking Google Apps as that seams the closest to an official name

Note: Google Drive is more about Google Drive and not about the suite so the suite should have it's own article. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 20:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BrandonXLF, that's a good idea and it does bring things into a more uniform structure. I'll plan on working an a Google Apps article and remove the merger request on this article. Thanks for the input. SBCornelius (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i agree with SBCornelius, they are different products that are also part of a suite of services. the Microsoft Office has articles for the suite as well as for each product; the same should be the case for Google Drive suite – i wouldn't merge them. danBLOO (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: clear consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 19:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google Docs → Docs (Google software) – The symbol of Google Docs CLEARLY STATES that Google Docs is refered to a "Docs".

Kind regards

Wikipedia autoconfirmed user

MrTrains227 14:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per WP:NATURAL. Disambiguations should be avoided if there is a similar commonly used name that could be used instead._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME and Zxcvbnm. -- Netoholic @ 19:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:NATURAL and WP:COMMONNAME. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above comments. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 20:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Rzvas (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose since this would make it confusing which is the Product Google Docs and which is the office suite Google Docs. The functionality, history, purpose, design, presentation, and usage of all these products are distinct and notable enough to merit separate articles. An overarching article might be G Suite, or some other an analog to Microsoft Office, iWork, andor Creative Suite; it should stay separate and give a summary of its constituent parts. — Supuhstar * — 06:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Google Docs (suite)

@SBCornelius: I think we should create a paged called Google Docs (suite) that would cover the general topic of Google Docs, Sheets et cetera. This article be like how Microsoft Office covers the general topic of Microsoft Word, PowerPoint et cetera. Having a dedicated article is much better that having multiple selections in different articles that cover this (Google Drive, G Suite, Google Docs, Google Sheets, Google Slides). – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 04:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]