This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Grgo Ilić is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Grgo Ilić is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Grgo's surname is Ilić, and he would signed all his documents with Ilić or Ilich - this can be checked in Sutjeska archive. Unfortunately we don't have access to these primary sources. Only common thing in case of his surname is that in German, Italian and Latin documents Ilić/Ilich was often misspelled as Ilijich, Higlich, Ilijic, Hilijic, Hiljich in primary sources, however available secondary sources point to his original surname Ilić, which is common surname for the entire region, and was predominant in the areal of his origin - anyway, Ilijić is archaic of Ilić, and is all but disappeared from use. But, all being said, WP:Commonname is ambiguous on this issue: Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources) as such names will usually best fit the five criteria listed above and followed by a guideline for editors: When there is no single, obvious name that is demonstrably the most frequently used for the topic by these sources, editors should reach a consensus as to which title is best by considering these criteria directly.; which also means that move should have been discussed, and that we don't make decision on titles by counting Google Search/Google Scholar hits.--౪ Santa ౪99°23:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
