Jump to content

Talk:Guimaras oil spill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

call for updates

[edit]

this story is more than a year old and needs an update. News on the results and consequences are welcome —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.14.85.246 (talk) 01:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

The second half of the background section is not neutral, it is biased against Petron Corp


change of article name

[edit]

I find that the term "Solar oil spill" is indeed more appropriate.
And "Guimaras oil spill" will be a redirect.
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view_article.php?article_id=17760 Jordz 08:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For reference and comparison, many articles in Category:Oil spills are named after the location of the disaster, save for the more famous one (like the Exxon Valdez oil spill). --Howard [[Special:Contributions/Howard the(UTC)

how to remove?

[edit]

how to remove the issue of oil spill happened in guimaras?

hello

[edit]

hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.255.144.5 (talk) 11:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Guimaras oil spill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]