Jump to content

Talk:HMS Aurora (1887)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


  • "Aurora participate in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee Fleet review" -participated.
    • Good catch.
  • What is the source for all that infobox data?
    • Everything in the infobox is sourced in the main body. Or at least it's supposed to be; if not let me know.

Very little to pick on, a very sound entry Sturmvogel 66Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Sound job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]