Talk:Hal Peck

Hal Peck has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 13, 2020. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Hal Peck appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Hal Peck reached Major League Baseball even after shooting off two of his toes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hal Peck.

Wikipedia

Baseball: Dodgers Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hal Peck/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 10:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this one shortly. Harrias ^talk 10:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

I get an "Error 404 Not Found" for refs #2, #6 and #13. (It doesn't really matter as full citation details are given, we can treat it as an offline source. Neither of these papers seem to be on Google Newspapers anymore; worth a check to see if they have moved to Newspapers.com; a link would be good if we can get it. Otherwise, just remove the url.)
{{open access}} is deprecated for citation templates now.
Ref #11 included a publisher, but no other newspaper sources (including ref #10 for the same paper) do.
Ref #21 doesn't need an access date.
His date of birth and date of death, which are included in the lead and the infobox needs to be included in the prose with a reference.
That he batted and threw left-handed is not referenced.
The date of his last MLB appearance is not referenced.
His career stats are not referenced.
The fact that he was a "World Series champion" is not mentioned in the prose.

Image

Image is appropriately licensed.
Alt text would be nice, but is not a GA requirement.

Prose

What does "everyday player" mean?
What is a "fly ball"?
"with the catch being" Avoid noun plus -ing.
"noted as "one of the greatest catches even seen in Columbus." By who? Provide inline attribution.
"shooting his foor" Typo.
Either explain, or provide a link, so the reader knows what a "6–2 record" is.
"though he did not record an at bat." What does this mean?

That's it from me. Harrias ^talk 08:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start working on it. For the open access template, what should I use in place of that? The deprecation is news to me, no idea something changed on that front. Wizardman 15:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing; it is just assumed that links are free to access unless otherwise noted: only non-free sources need marking. Harrias ^talk 16:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issues now fixed. I wasn't sure how to reword the everyday player since i was using the literal definition, so i just moved the games played up from further down since it gets the point across. Wizardman 23:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that makes more sense now. Nice work on this, I'm happy that it meets the GA criteria now. Harrias ^talk 08:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]