Talk:Harry Dorsey Gough

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Methodism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Harry Dorsey Gough appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Harry Dorsey Gough was indicted for preaching at his own home during the American Revolution because he refused to swear the oath of allegiance to Maryland's rebel government?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Dorsey Gough.

Wikipedia

Dubious sourced claim

The fred/ source in the article supports the claim that

During the Amercan Revolution Harry served on the staff of Col. John Eager Howard

but (a) the source actually (and erroneously) calls Howard a general and (b) seems hard to square with the numerous other sources calling Harry a Nonjuror who sat out the war on the sidelines without swearing an Oath of Allegiance to the rebel government. It seems like that would be a necessary precondition to being an aide-de-camp to one of the principal military leaders in his area, so I'm leaving this out for now until there's an explanation about how to square this. — $Llywelyn II$ 12:29, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that probably puts an end to that idea. Archive.org's list of the Archives of Maryland Muster Rolls for the Revolution doesn't seem to include this Gough. —

Llywelyn II

11:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This family...

The article is well-sourced but clearing up disputes in the sources will probably require someone visiting the Maryland State Archives.

In addition to H.D. Gough's brother having a son and grandson both named H.D. Gough (?!!), it looks like the relatively penniless Thomas Gough who worked as the Clerk Asst to the Committee of Laws and got thrown in debtor's "goal" may have been a different one from the English immigrant who left a wealthy son behind. H.D. Gough's Papenfuse bio makes him the son of the poor one, but that (a) doesn't square with the marriage with the Dorsey planters or the inheritance from the wealthy son or (b) make as much sense as the poor one being the third-generation Marylander whose grandfather was responsible for the Goughs Purchase in Calvert Co. in 1677. (Or an entirely different one. There were also servants and slaves named "Thomas Gough" listed in Maryland's 1760s emancipation records.)

And at the same time, £70,000 seems like an impossible sum for someone with an assessed value (per Papenfuse) of £871, 5s in 1783. Maybe the 70k source missed some dots, turning £700.0.0 into something altogether different? — $Llywelyn II$ 12:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]