Talk:Henri Le Floch
Action Française
[edit]I described this movement as "extreme right-wing", and I stick to that categorisation, which I believe would be shared by a consensus of commentators. My fellow editor JASpencer altered this to "monarchist". This is a correct description, but, with respect, I can't help thinking that it is rather euphemistic. Monarchism in the English-speaking world is a mainstream, unremarkable movement. Monarchism in the French context, however, is a fringe movement bound up with radical right-wing political ideas (opposition to the Republic, the French Constitution, secularism, capitalism, the Jewish community, etc, etc). Calling AF simply a "monarchist" organisation fails to capture this important point. It is too gentle a word.Shoneen (talk) 12:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not about condemning but accurately describing. JASpencer (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I believe that "monarchist" is an inaccurate term in this context, and "extreme right-wing" is a more accurate term. I also believe that this is consistent with the views of expert opinion on the subject, and I can back this up without difficulty. Without wishing in any way to get personal, I have a suspicion that JASpencer (whom I have respect for, as I do for any other editor who gives up their time for Wikipedia) is an American user - I suspect that a European who knows the European political scene would not be arguing this point, because it is a fairly obvious one from a European perspective.Shoneen (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not an American. I just prefer an accurate and neutral wikipedia. 22:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I believe that "monarchist" is an inaccurate term in this context, and "extreme right-wing" is a more accurate term. I also believe that this is consistent with the views of expert opinion on the subject, and I can back this up without difficulty. Without wishing in any way to get personal, I have a suspicion that JASpencer (whom I have respect for, as I do for any other editor who gives up their time for Wikipedia) is an American user - I suspect that a European who knows the European political scene would not be arguing this point, because it is a fairly obvious one from a European perspective.Shoneen (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henri Le Floch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928040557/http://www.angelusonline.org/Article182-thread-order1-threshold0.phtml to http://www.angelusonline.org/Article182-thread-order1-threshold0.phtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)