A fact from Historical significance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 June 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
I hear you, but slinging it by the main page brings it to our attention for repairs or improvement. Wikipedia is all about "history", yet most editors haven't a clue about how biased their quote selections are or really think about whether information is worth including.
We all need to ask ourselves, "What is the historical significance of what we are including or editing?". And "How can we embrace all perspectives for that?". Perhaps this article should be fleshed out with examples, and be required reading for all Wiki Editors. 72.141.106.240 (talk) 14:08, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]