Talk:Hoʻokena (group)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 3 December 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved, consensus is that the base title should be a disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hoʻokena → Hoʻokena (group) – The term is needed for an article about the populated place of the same name (cf. U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Hoʻokena (group) and [1]) ThT (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose This is too early since no such article exists. Please make the article with a disambiguated name before opening an WP:RM.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support But not per nom, base name should be disambiguated.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support Hoʻokena (town) @Zxcvbnm: you might want to revisit this, in books the settlement is clearly primary, overall no primary. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: The RM didn't mention such an article at all and did not imply the creation of a disambiguation page. I will revise my opinion based on this.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.