Talk:Hurricane Lili (1984)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Lili (1984) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hurricane Lili (1984) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 31, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 22, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
April 5, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
September 23, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
April 1, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	The possible merging of this article has been discussed by editors of the WikiProject.

Todo

Just not enough information, it seems. Outside of meteorological information there are only 3 sentences of substances in the article. Jdorje 20:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, despite that fault I still put this at B because it has that Epsilion or Zeta look to it (the infomation that is). Storm05 16:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, why does this storm have an article again? No damages or deaths? This should be merged... — jdorje (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(And yes, epsilon and zeta should be merged too.) — jdorje (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because storms can be notable without causing damage. Hurricanehink 22:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but these aren't. Just being an off-season storm does not mean a storm needs an article. — jdorje (talk) 23:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Assessment

Broadness: Pass
NPOV: Pass
Well-written: Pass
Factually Accuratte: Pass
Images: Pass
Stability: Pass

All in all, a good article. Passed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mitchazenia (talk • contribs) 22:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Hurricane Lili (1984)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Procedural delist Noah, AA^Talk 15:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge consensus Noah, AA^Talk 15:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.