Talk:I Love Lisa

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I Love Lisa article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

I Love Lisa has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

I Love Lisa is part of the The Simpsons (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 3, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
November 27, 2008	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

The Simpsons High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

edit

Collaboration: Featured topic Drive
Copyedit:
Merge:
Cleanup: Ralph Wiggum, Milhouse Van Houten
Shorten plot synopsis:
Free-use images: Jon Vitti, Pamela Hayden, Greg Daniels, Ian Maxtone-Graham, Jim Reardon, Alf Clausen
Reference: Bongo Comics Group, The Heartbroke Kid, World of Springfield
Expand: The Simpsons Theme, Bongo Comics, Mark Kirkland, Jim Reardon, The Simpsons: Tapped Out
Stubs: Neil Affleck, Bob Anderson (director), Wes Archer, J. Stewart Burns More...

Television: Episode coverage Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as High-importance).

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guh? Buh.

"This was the first The Simpsons episode Frank Mula wrote and it was an audition for him to get on The Simpsons."

What? Does this mean that Mula wrote the script on spec and was promised a proper position on the writing staff if the episode was successful?

The only thing he mentioned was it was his audition so I've deleted that.

Did someone in the commentary actually say "fat and dumb"? If so, please wrap it in quotes as it currently looks a little flippant. Bradley0110 (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done! :) TheLeft orium 14:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Love Lisa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I've made a couple of minor changes, but I have no hesitation to pass this as a GA. It's well structured and well-written. My only suggestion would be to change the verb "got" in the lead. "Get" is a vague verb with many meanings, and the fact I can't think of an alternative goes a little way to prove that. At the moment it doesn't affect the readability however so I'll leave it up to you to change it. Well done.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Peanut4 (talk) 13:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks! I changed "got" to "came up with". --TheLeft orium 13:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lesser Known Presidents' Song

What does it parody? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.63.16 (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cited Source Inaccurate?

Under Cultural References it states "The orchestral version of Tony Bennett's "Stranger in Paradise" can be heard in an Itchy and Scratchy cartoon." This appears to be a simple misnomer as the piece in the cartoon is clearly just the "Gliding Dance of the Maidens" Polovtsian Dance which Tony Bennett's song is directly based. I was going to change it, but noticed that the citation corroborates it. I'm unsure what to do now, so I left it be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.114.17 (talk) 06:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]