Talk:Immunocontraception

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Immunocontraception is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

behavioral effects of immunocontraceptives

Online PZP apparently increases sexual interest, possibly an improvement over oral hormonal contraceptives. has this effect been shown at a variety of species — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.2.34 (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite in the works

This article is very incomplete. Its information doesn't give the reader a very good feel for the extent of current immunocontraceptive use or the breadth of research in immunocontraception. I wrote a paper on immunocontraception for my biology class last semester, and I'm currently working on a more comprehensive article for Wikipedia. I should have something I'd like to replace this stub with in a few weeks. Unless, of course, there is some objection? Joshua Born (talk) 16:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on the rewrite of this article. Clearly it has taken longer than "a few weeks." My mistake was that the article I was originally writing went beyond the scope of an encyclopedia article. I was starting to write a comprehensive history of research in immunocontraception, which is more than what is necessary for an encyclopedia article and more than what my free time can handle. I've since scaled back and have stuck to citing review papers and select seminal papers rather than trying to include a reference to every single paper of original research. I plan to finish the rewrite next weekend. Joshua Born (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just published my rewrite of this article! I hope one and all find it edifying reading. I know it was edifying writing it. The 68 references have exhausted my eyeballs. Joshua Born (talk) 23:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-sectioning and expanded front matter

It has come to my attention that the general reader can view this article as I wrote it and come away still asking what immunocontraception actually is. Currently the article is organized roughly chronologically. I am going to reorganize the article similar to an editorial on the subject (Naz 2011) to be sectioned by method of action: gamete function, gamete production, and gamete outcome. Then I'll include expanded front matter in each section and for the whole article that includes more basic biology and explains how each method of action is thought to work. Joshua Born (talk) 14:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deployed the re-sectioning and expanded front matter. Joshua Born (talk) 00:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

There's a problem with the section headings, some of which use =Level 1= headings. Level 1 headings are not used in articles per WP:LAYOUT. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I just fixed it. I think I must have introduced the level 1 headings accidentally when I reorganized the article. Joshua Born (talk) 19:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Immunocontraception. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]