Jump to content

Talk:Imperial Pacific

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relationship with First Natural Foods

[edit]

There seems to be some debate or confusion about Imperial Pacific's relationship to First Natural Foods. While some editors seem to believe that they are unrelated or that First Natural Foods is merely a "shell company", all evidence seems to point to First Natural Foods changing its name to Imperial Pacific. If anyone can dispute this claim or the merits of keeping it in this article then feel free to discuss it here or be bold in adding it to the article (with appropriate sources). FallingGravity (talk) 21:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse Listing

[edit]

This is inaccurate, the defunct company was acquired as a reverse listing. The current gaming company has no relevance to the food company. http://www.forbes.com/profile/cui-lijie/ Please refrain on editing articles based on misinformation. If in doubt, please refer to filing documents with the HKEx and only refer to official sources please. unhedge (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source you provide does not mention reverse listing. Bloomberg and numerous sources state that it changed names (they even has the same SEHK number). FallingGravity (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly,there is already a well documented version of this in Chinese, secondly a ticker code does not change when a company is acquired on the HKEx, http://macaubusinessdaily.com/Gaming/Inventive-Star-increases-interest-in%C2%A0Imperial%C2%A0Pacific-65-pct http://www.sfc.hk/web/EN/files/ENF/HighCon/e01076140801.pdf unhedge (talk) 07:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: the same source you yourself quoted Bloomberg, cleary states there was a merger/acquisition in December 2015 unhedge (talk) 07:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But it doesn't state what happened during that merger. According to Yahoo! Finance it changed names from First Natural Foods to Imperial Pacific in May 2014. I'm still waiting for sources that prove otherwise. FallingGravity (talk) 19:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The secondary sources that have been provided about the acquisition/merger are preferable to the primary sources offered which exclude that information. Any person or company can say what they want about themselves; it is what other reliable sources say about them that matters. ScrpIronIV 20:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]