Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 275 (Ohio–Indiana–Kentucky)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Time Zone Sentence Incorrect

The introduction to this entry has false information in it. Dearborn County, like four other Indiana counties near Cincinnati have adjusted their clocks like the rest of the Cincinnati Metropolitian Area. As such, you would not be changing you clocks when you entered Dearborn County. The sentence stating that you would need to set your clock twice during the summer is false, and as such I propose that it should be deleted. Previously I tried to delete this sentence, but it since has been changed back. TraderJake 01:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)TraderJake

Kentucky Separation

Any real reason that Kentucky is separated into regions?192.122.237.11 21:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, milepost 0 is located at the I-71/I-75/I-275 interchange, which means that for the exit numbering to make any sense, Kentucky has to be split in half in the table into the portion west of milepost 0 and the portion east of milepost 0 (the latter obviously following Ohio, since the list, like the exit numbers, proceeds clockwise around the beltway). --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Article title

Shouldn't this be located at Interstate 275 (Indiana-Kentucky-Ohio)? --Holderca1 talk 21:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually 2nd largest?

In checking on the M25 loop in London, the wikipedia article [1] says that it is not actually a continuous loop. Wouldn't that make 275 the second longest continuous loop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.25.132 (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I am removing this statement completely. It's not sourced and its wrong to start with. Texas State Highway Loop 1604 is longer. --Holderca1 talk 21:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 275 (Ohio–Indiana–Kentucky). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Can someone just make 3 seperate articles?

So, I know I-275 is barely in Indiana, but it should still count for 3 articles. It goes into 3 states, and I-78 is in New York for less than a mile and is in 3 articles, despite some roads like US 8 not. However, it is long and detailed in both Kentucky and Ohio. (By the way, if you want to strike down my proposal, I did not come here to protest US 8 or I-78, so only mention I-275. I also am now neutral on the issue of I-295(Delaware-Pennsylvania).)This is a little longish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.16.99.72 (talk) 23:46 26 October 2019 (UTC)

It isn't necessary to create sub articles. The guideline hasn't been applied to auxiliary Interstates, and it's never been an absolute rule that three states means sub articles. Imzadi 1979  02:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This article needs expansion before we even consider splitting it. The history only has one paragraph. Needforspeed888 (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)