Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 695 (New York)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Would it be a good idea to merge this into Interstate 295? It is officially part of I-295, and it doesn't really serve any independent utility. --NE2 14:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While both internal NYSDOT referencing and the FHWA consider this as I-295 (see the total lengths), I-695 is clearly signed as a different route and I-695 is all the general public sees. Note that the Cross Bronx Extension appears to be a state-maintained internally unnumbered road (it is not 295I nor is it a reference route). The exit numbering for I-295 follows the Cross Bronx, however. Bottom line is, I'm unsure about how best to handle this. Merging might be ok but I generally prefer to have separate articles for routes that are signposted differently. --Polaron | Talk 15:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 695 (New York). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]