Talk:Iron oxide nanoparticle

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

wrong reference

could not find the ref in the "Molecular Imaging" journal. Page number does not exists (starts with 1536 in 2011).

Böhm I.A rapid and user-friendly method to quantify the iron content after magnetic cell loading with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.Molecular Imaging 2011;10:270-277

I couldn't find it with a Google Scholar search either. I have replaced it with another citation. Thanks for pointing this out. RockMagnetist (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Nanoworm" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nanoworm. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 15#Nanoworm until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – bradv🍁 05:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's frustrating that no Wikipedia entry exists for nanoworms (not even a redirect), because scientists aren't prone to defining the word when they use it (and they are still using it); so, it's hard to figure out what they actually are. If there had been a Wikipedia article, we might not have that conspiracy theory about nanoworms today (search for nanoworms on duckduckgo.com to find it prominently featured). Here are some links about nanoworms that I think are sufficient to merit an article, personally:

Yeah, it's not defined very well, but scientists apparently seem to know what it means enough to not bother explaining themselves.

75.174.127.97 (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]