Jump to content

Talk:Isotopes of potassium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of potassium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

31K

[edit]

31K gets one mention and some links, but is otherwise ignored in the article. Do we fully include or fully exclude it? Hcobb (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hcobb: In the articles Potassium and Isotopes of potassium I did not find any mentioning of 31K (potassium-31). Could you point out where you see those mentionings? -DePiep (talk) 19:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From this article:

"All other potassium isotopes have half-lives under a day, most under a minute. The least stable is 31K, a three-proton emitter discovered in 2019; its half-life was measured to be shorter than 10 picoseconds.[4][5]"

Hcobb (talk) 18:10, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, it's in there.
Now could it be the 10 picoseconds (very short HL) that makes this one 'not recognised as an isotope'? (I could not find such a treshold though). -DePiep (talk) 18:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added it to the table and lead section; its observation and very short half-life are clearly described in the sources. I believe it is still recognized as an isotope (one threshold I found is ~10−12 s, but we include unbound states on the order of 10−22 s, so that doesn't matter). However, as far as I can tell, the intermediate isotope 32K is still unobserved, though it is most likely unbound as well. ComplexRational (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

42K

[edit]

Shouldn't 42K be a trace radionuclide because on the Isotopes of argon page, it says 42Ar is a trace radionuclide. 42Ar β decays into 42K so shouldn't 42K be a trace radionuclide? -322UbnBr2 (Talk | Contributions | Actions) 03:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution of 40K to the geothermal gradient?

[edit]

Should some mention be made of the contribution of 40K to the geothermal gradient, assuming it is still accepted as such? Vaughan Pratt (talk) 06:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Half-life of beta plus decay

[edit]

"40K has the longest known half-life for any positron-emitter nuclide." I suppose that this refers to the partial half-life of beta plus decay. When just talking about the half-life, 138La has a longer one. 2A04:CEC0:1011:B1F1:C5E3:F416:5CD7:1B03 (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potassium-34 decay width

[edit]

Can someone access the discovery paper for this isotope and check for a decay width? This information is sufficient to calculate a half-life. This paper also discovered 37Sc and 38Sc, and there should also be decay widths if 34K has one.

Dronchi, N.; Charity, R. J.; Sobotka, L. G.; Brown, B. A.; Weisshaar, D.; Gade, A.; Brown, K. W.; Reviol, W.; Bazin, D.; Farris, P. J.; Hill, A. M.; Li, J.; Longfellow, B.; Rhodes, D.; Paneru, S. N.; Gillespie, S. A.; Anthony, A. K.; Rubino, E.; Biswas, S. (2024-09-12). "Evolution of shell gaps in the neutron-poor calcium region from invariant-mass spectroscopy of 37,38Sc, 35Ca, and 34K". Physical Review C. 110 (3). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.L031302. ISSN 2469-9985.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]