Jump to content

Talk:Israeli government response to the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

UNRWA coercion by Israel

[edit]

Shouldn't this Reuters article about the UNRWA report, that says Israel coerced some agency employees to falsely admit Hamas links, be included in the International Support > UNRWA section?

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/unrwa-report-says-israel-coerced-some-agency-employees-falsely-admit-hamas-links-2024-03-08/ Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CarmenEsparzaAmoux,
Would you be interested in adding this in?
Additional source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/13/after-the-unrwa-report-more-accounts-of-israels-torture-in-gaza Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Green checkmarkY Done! CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 23:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Civil section: Including Pro-war protests

[edit]

In Israel, there was significant government criticism for insufficient military response and aggression to eliminate Hamas and free the hostages. This is covered elsewhere in wikipedia, Israel–Hamas war protests in Israel#Anti-Palestinian protests, and is important to present. The current article appears to have a bias presenting the Israeli public as being opposed to war, when in fact, the public favored a decisive response to the invasion by Hamas. Polling found that 57% of respondents were upset about the insufficient use of Israeli firepower in conflict with Hamas and only 10% supported a pause in fighting.[1]

Fileyfood500 (talk) 23:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]