Jump to content

Talk:It's Mr. Pants

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JFG reference important?

[edit]

Is the Jet Force Gemini reference here really necessary? Does it have anything to do with this game (I wouldn't know; I've never played it myself) or should it be ripped out and put onto the Mr. Pants page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.161.179.49 (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A cheat in Jet Force Gemini turns most but not all of the minor enemies into "Mr. Pants". Since Jet Force Gemini was released before It's Mr. Pants, I'd say it's probably important enough to keep. Mandanthe1 03:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be renamed "It's Mr Pants" (without the dot).

[edit]

...because, if you look at the picture of the game cover, there is no dot there. The actual name of the game does not contain the dot. Avengah (talk) 18:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, while other third party websites & publications vary between them, THQ has it listed as Mr. with the dot. Twirly Pen (Speak up) 10:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on It's Mr. Pants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]