Talk:Jaša Tomić, Sečanj

Ethnic Serb villages?

Which of these villages were ethnic Serb? Bendeguz 20:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you have a point, I checked some sources and only one of those places was majority Serb, while total number of places was 3, not 4. PANONIAN (talk) 00:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name, picture, etc...

When was the town/village of Modoš renamed Jaša Tomić? And I'm afraid the picture in the article is positively comic, because there is not a house or a person to be seen. Where are our Serb colleagues? The coverage of things Serbian in the English Wikipedia is so sparse. Please feel free to expand and initiate articles even if your English is not perfect. Others will work on the style. Bmcln1 (talk) 08:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I translated some of the town history from here: http://www.jasatomic.org/monografija/ - it would be nice that we have web pages with so many data about all settlements of Vojvodina. Anyway, I do not have enough free time to translate more, so this should be enough for now. I also agree that we do not have any good picture that show this town, but until somebody make better pictures we have to use those that we have. PANONIAN 18:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 July 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure)

Jaša Tomić, Sečanj → Jaša Tomić (Sečanj) – This is what the naming convention says the name should be. See: Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Serbia. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:25, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support - We should be consistent on how disambiguate place names. IJA (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Is the move obstructed? I've moved dozens of pages so far to conform with WP:NCGN#Serbia. It is maybe worth considering changing the naming convention to conform to more widespread "comma convention", but until then, titles should be consistent within Serbia. No such user (talk) 06:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jaša Tomić, Sečanj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090324080831/http://www.jasatomic.org.rs/ to http://www.jasatomic.org.rs/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.jasatomic.org.rs/english.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]