Talk:Jabiru J430
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jabiru J430 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
This article needs more major work on it! I got quite angry, (unreasonably?), while applying the template, that the original writer had done such a poor job. I have started to sort it out but I'm afraid someone else is going to have to finish the job!Petebutt (talk) 10:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks AHunt!Petebutt (talk) 07:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Crash
[edit]In a recent incident, the wings of a Jabiru 450 apparently came off after a "sudden manoeuvre", causing a fatal crash. I added a brief description (quoted below); it was reverted with the edit summary "Tragic as this sorts of accidents are they are commonplace and not notable, please see WP:AIRCRASH for the inclusion criteria".
The guideline is clear, and the reversion accorded with it; this is not a complaint. However, I would suggest that a purpose of any encycopaedia is to be useful (I don't know if this is in any formal Wikipedia guideline). Insofar as documenting past events or the history of something, this accident is indeed trivial and not of long-term significance unless it gives rise to changes (per WP:AIRCRASH). However, the encyclopaedia is consulted by people for all sorts of reasons. In particular I would argue that the details of this event are relevant to anyone considering purchasing or travelling in a light aircraft. Obviously, facts only must be stated, not opinion. I would suggest that guideline WP:AIRCRASH, a guideline not a rule, is perhaps overridden by the need to be useful, and that this section belongs in the article, and will continue to do so for the useful like of this design (or until superseded by newer developments). I do not myself propose to reinstate it, but if others agree maybe they will. Best wishes Pol098 (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
The section in question:
- Incidents
On 27 June 2014 a J450, registered as G-SIMP, crashed in France, killing both its occupants. Air accident investigators said both wings had failed before the crash after a "sudden manoeuvre" by the plane, and it then "fell like a stone".[1][2]
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jabiru J430. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719042927/http://www.jabiru.co.za/aircraft.htm to http://www.jabiru.co.za/aircraft.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)