Talk:Jack Skellington

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Holidays: Christmas / Halloween Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Halloween task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled

Added a photo of him at the Christmas town scene in A Nightmare Before Christmas --SkinnerIJA 08:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Put in the cameo spot that he appeared in Grim Tales! (68.192.242.97 02:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Please don't. Grim Tales is a fan-made web-comic that features a variety of other horror-themed pop-culture cameos and breaks a lot of copyright laws in the process, and is not at all notable nor is it even canotonical for Jack's character. 75.157.78.82 (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any pics of Jack in the Simpsons you should add about the jack hentai porn thats online —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.32.150 (talk) 10:38, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

??? Jack porn? How is that relevent to the article? It is useless (and disgusting) trivia that no-one, barring necrophiliacs, really wants to read about, so leave it out. 75.157.78.82 (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cameo

How exactly does Jack make a cameo in "Beetlejuice" which was release five years before his debut?PatrickWB (talk) 17:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His face appears on Beetlejuice's hat when he turns into the carnival attraction-monster near the end of the film. Not a significant cameo in my opinion, if it could be called a cameo, but let's leave it there for now. 75.157.78.82 (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, I have looked at the video and it just looks like a skeleton head (skull). I see no way to identify that positively as Jack Skellington. In fact, Jack's head is near perfectly round and the one in Beetlejuice seemed more oval-shaped.--98.196.54.246 (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Zerodog.JPG

Image:Zerodog.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jackcool.JPG

Image:Jackcool.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of External Links

Two links were deleted - one to a blog and another to a page with a Jack Skellington pumpkin carving. Per Wikipedia's "Links to Avoid" list, the first link was a blog - an external link generally discouraged by Wikipedia for inclusion. The second link contributed nothing to the subject of Jack Skellington. Further investigation of the external link found that the host site was a for-profit product page that sold software enabling customers to carve pumpkin images. Ultatri (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kidnap the Sandy Claws

The one thing Jack did in the film that he should have known was not "kindhearted" was having Santa kiddnapped. Granted, he didn't mean for Santa to be tortured, and he did put himself in harm's way to save him later, but still, do you think his willingness to do something wrong to get what he wants should be mentioned under the "personality" section? Web wonder (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering his intent, I don't think that the kidnapping disqualifies the kindhearted part of the description. He greets Santa Claus with open arms and makes specific note to make sure that Santa was comfortable as he was detained (though the kids completely ignored that). By all indications, Skellington thought Santa would appreciate the break and he treated the entire affair like it was a surprise party. The actions could hardly be described as malevolent. Even calling them selfish would be rather iffy, as his interaction with Santa indicated an "everybody wins" mindset. I'd say that at best he could be described as misguided or overeager, both of which are already fairly well represented in the article as a whole 141.166.234.196 (talk) 03:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't describe it as "malevolent" either, but it wasn't very nice. I don't think anyone wants to be stuffed in a bag and taken somewhere against their will (there's no evidence that Jack ordered Lock, Shock, and Barrel to use the bag, but he obviously didn't mind that they were doing it). If he had been motivated solely by a desire to give Santa a break and not a determination to replace him weather he wanted it or not, he could have just come to Santa and offered to deliver presents for him. Web wonder (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leave out the "willing to do someting wrong to achieve his goals." What Jack did may have been wrong, but he is the leader of a holiday that revolves around fright and malice. If you look at what he was doing in the movie, he had been trying to get the other monsters to understand the feeling he'd gotten in Christmas Town and then said, "To heck with it," and did the whole "Making Christmas" thing. If you even look at the lyrics to the song "What's This?", he was genuinely confused by the lack of mayham and bloodshed in Christmas Town. The use of the bag by Shock, Lock, and Barrel can be overlooked due to their sadism (they tried to feed Santa to Oogie Boogie) and the fact they were considering shooting him with a cannon. I agree with the overzealous and misguided part, so keep those in the article. 75.157.78.82 (talk) 11:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Skellington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616030305/http://www.ugo.com/games/best-heroes-of-all-time?page=6 to http://www.ugo.com/games/best-heroes-of-all-time?page=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Skellingtons first appearance

Google it, he first appeared in 1982 2603:6012:7D3F:FF88:71C1:8518:2C6:BBC1 (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]