Talk:Jaitharia

Removal of content

Removing Sachchidanand's ref and Sadasivan's ref as both are not WP:HISTRS. Akalanka820 (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can refer to it- [[1]] Akalanka820 (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HISTRS also says this:This essay doesn't mean to imply that reliable non-scholarly sources are inappropriate or insufficient just because scholarly sources are available or potentially available. Finding and using scholarly sources is a best practice, not a requirement. Problem is that, if we go on rejecting sources large number of articles need to be deleted from Wikipedia as high quality sources are not available for all castes. Don't ping, just leave your message, i was on a routine check-up of some of the caste articles that's why reached here.Admantine123 (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this matter they fail to pass WP:RS, firstly you stop following me. You had no edits here but you are continuously engaging into harassing here. Secondly, as per Sitush Sadashivan in these matters is strictly unreliable. Last point, your continuous contrary behaviour on Rajput, Bhumihar, and even related to some other groups compared to Koeri, Kushwaha is being noted. Please don't push me to take this matter up Akalanka820 (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there are two reliable references, I will add more to it when I get time but we cannot use excuse to allow mostly non-academic info to remain especially in such a contentious topic. I am sure had it been related to a particular community page, your approach would be different. Akalanka820 (talk) 15:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: mention this in the target page, with a good ref.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]