Talk:Jan Suchorzewski

A fact from Jan Suchorzewski appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the effigy of Jan Suchorzewski, who once threatened to kill his son to prevent the signing of the Constitution of 3 May, was hanged during the Kościuszko Insurrection?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jan Suchorzewski.

Wikipedia

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

After reviewing the article, I have to ask about this sentence:

Despite his opposition of many reforms, he nonetheless played a major, if perhaps not necessarily intentional,[11] role in the passage of the Free Royal Cities Act in April of 1791.[12][13]

What role did Suchorzewski play? How was it unintentional? Please elaborate a little. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this clarifies the situation. The sources, IIRC, somewhat vary on the specifics. Particularly, IIRC again, they vary on whether he really meant to support the act, or whether one of his usually pointless speeches actually had some unintentional merit and created openings for the reformers to do something constructive. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 00:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]