Talk:Jersey Farm

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hertfordshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

Untitled

- - IMPORTANT Please do not remove any information from this article without posting justification on the talk page first.

Darren.gorman 13:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't those closing comments about "Andrew" be deleted? Aside from being devoid of detail, entirely unreferenced, and irrelevant to the article, it is potentially libellous to the restaurant/proprietor concerned (if he/it even exists). This does not accord with Wikipedia's policies re: weasel words and provision of citations.

I think the 'existence' of Andrew and his establishment is indisputable, furthermore, I have submitted extra information as to the nature of this prominent figure in Jersey Farm's community. Darren.gorman 01:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 01:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I too, find it unneeded and rather intimidating that Andrew's name is needed to be mentioned within this rather poor detail of Jersey Farm. I am unaware of any resident within Jersey Farm who considers 'Andrew' a traitor - however rather people admire the kind man's work and lovely restaurant. I kindly request this untrue and insufficient information to be removed. If not I think we'll have to get Andrew to take a look for himself.

Kind Regards,

Ben. BenFelton 23:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited the section on Andrew, which was hopelessly out of date. Now he will get the recognition he deserves. Publicsourcev5 17:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]