Talk:Jet airliner

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Image copyright problem with File:Vickers Nene Viking G-AJPH.jpg

The image File:Vickers Nene Viking G-AJPH.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strobe lights

What are the requirements for strobe lights, indicators on a commercial passenger jet airliner? What configuration is required by law? Are they for identification purpuses as well as visibility? What places on the plane are they required to be? i.e.: each wingtips, front and back top and bottom?

84.215.32.86 (talk) 04:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the cleanup request

One thing that could be improved would be a new lead. The lead so far only gives a very short and insufficient definition and one detail from the history of the subject that seems to have been picked out arbitrarily. --Hans Dunkelberg (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I just fixed the introduction, but I think that the whole article needs to be overhauled. There is a lot about history and less about propulsion systems and their relative merit.

Could a specialist fix this page?

OppugnGrundyism (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

prices

Hello, I compiled some relevant information about real prices : User:Marc_Lacoste/sandbox/Airliner_prices. Do you think it would be better suited in Competition between Airbus and Boeing, in Airliner, Jet Airliner, or another relevant article? Thanks. --Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added to Competition between Airbus and Boeing --Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jet airliner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160515192215/http://adg.stanford.edu/aa241/propulsion/engineplacement.html to http://adg.stanford.edu/aa241/propulsion/engineplacement.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

From the photos in the article, one might think all airliners were either obscure British airliners, or Airbuses! - BilCat (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I renovated the picture selection: four American, four European. It is Boeing-dominated, but after all they are the most innovative and widespread.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]